Friday, October 30, 2009

'Why the World Dislikes America' Yeah, so What?

Via RealClearWorld comes this article from the Hindu. India is a fairly pro-American nation, and it serves to reason that this article is written by a Russian. Some of its funnier parts are:

The American ideology produces a sublimated version, so to say, of human equality. It stresses that lineage, education, ethnicity and so on do not matter in making one a full-fledged member of the community or a citizen of the world. As the American Dream has it, anyone can get rich, become President…

Such democracy brings unexpected fruits — it makes ordinary Americans conceited, and totally unlike, say, Western Europeans in terms of culture and education.

So if I'm reading this correctly, it would be more...desirable... to have a system where ethnicity automatically puts a person into their place in life. Is it also better to tell children that they can't be anything but simple (stupid) workers?

It can be assumed that the pressure of mass culture that is eroding the traditional culture was the root cause of the tragedy of 9/11.


And don't forget that our kindness to immigrants has helped us become a melting pot which makes us stronger. Or according to the article, a horrible, horrible mess:

The U.S. has been from the start a land of immigrants, be they first-generation or tenth-generation. A population gathered from every part of the world gives it economic dynamism but is also a problem that whips up global anti-Americanism.

If this is why some of the world dislikes us, I think that we're doing something right.

How Obama Has Failed in his First Term

I'm going to say this straight out: if the President does not pass his Health Care Plan soon, the rest of his time in office will be a lame duck. That said, this article is not just bashing Obama, but actual facts that you can look up yourself. If you want to lambaste him, or add to the list, do so in the comments, they are always welcome.

This list is primarily campaign promises that he failed to live up to.
What the President has failed to do (which he promised):

1. Prevent unemployment from breaking 8.0%.

The President assured the American public that if his Stimulus Plan was passed, unemployment would not rise above 8%. Unfortunately, that promise eventually turned out to be a failure, and the unemployment rate now stands at 9.5%.

2. Allow Americans to view new bills five days before going to vote.

If you remember, the President said that, with his election, there would be a new era of transparency in the government, allowing voters to read bills at least five days before they went to vote. Unfortunately, the transparency he must of been referring to was his own. The failure of this came when he rammed the Stimulus Bill through the Legislative Branch, putting the bill in print less than a day before it was to be voted on.

3. 'There is no Pork in the Stimulus Bill.'

Well, I don't even think I need to show you that this has been a failed promise. That's how badly this promise failed.

4. Gitmo will be closed as early as the first week of his Presidency.

CNN reported that the President planned to closed the much lamented (on the left) Guantanamo Bay prison. Guess what? Guantanamo is still open to this day because the President had no, snicker, exit strategy, i.e. he had no idea where to send the terrorists after the base was closed. Fail.

5. Lower racial tension in the United States.

The President assured voters that he would work very hard to bring people of different backgrounds together. While this is a noble cause, the President utterly failed when he stuck his nose into the arrest of Professor Henry Gates, saying that the officers acted "stupidly." This led to a crap-storm in the media, and the President later gave a pseudo-apology.

Ah, I'm getting bored with all of these broken promises, so maybe I'll continue this some other time.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Vote in Our Poll: Who Will Win in New Jersey?

Newt Gingrich has not only endorsed "Dede" Scozzafava...

When the former Speaker of the House endorsed "Dede" Scozzafava's campaign in New York's special congressional election in New York's 23rd congressional district, he did not only endorse the positions of Scozzafava, who is as radical as them come in Republican clothing, he has endorsed everything Scozzafava has surrounded herself with, whether or not he meant to.

When Newt Gingrich endorsed Scozzafava, he endorsed some of the most radical positions one candidate could take in the United States of America, while I do not question Newt's Conservatism, I do question his wisdom and poor choice in judgement, as Mr.Gingrich is not standing for the Republican party, he is standing for Newt Gingrich.

Mr.Gingrich has now endorsed a candidate who is against the secret ballot in unionization elections, and supports increased unionization in the American business place.

Mr.Gingrich has now endorsed a candidate who is radical enough on abortion to receive a planned parenthood award, which she received with glee and joy.

Mr.Gingrich has now endorsed a candidate who has the support of the New York State United Teachers, an organization which opposes the supposed "education reforms" that Mr.Gingrich so believes in.

Mr.Gingrich has now endorsed a candidate who has been endorsed by the radical leftist Daily Kos political blog, a blog which is endorsing Scozzafava because she is the most liberal candidate.

Mr.Gingrich has now endorsed a candidate who has been endorsed by the ACORN associated "Working Families Party" several times, not to mention the "WISH list" has also endorsed Scozzafava, an organization devoted to electing "anti-life" Republican women to Congress.

Mr.Gingrich has now endorsed a candidate who supports the Obama stimulus package, something all 178 Republicans in the House of Representatives opposed.

Mr.Gingrich has now endorsed a candidate who is to the left of Congressman Castle of Delaware, Congressman Cao of Louisiana, and the former Connecticut Congressman Rob Simmons, all of which are amongst the most leftist Republicans elected to Congress.

Mr.Gingrich, you really expect our support when you attempt to gain the Republican nomination in 2012? When you will not even lend Conservatism and the Conservatives who espouse those views now? Doug Hoffman is the real Conservative Republican in this election, it is about hightime you realize that.

-- Tim K

Need more proof Hollywood is the scum of the earth?

Hollywood, the land of endless examples of what happens when you cast your lot with a bunch of deranged liberal lunatics, essentially you turn into an immoral piece of trash who supports a child rapist like Roman Polanski. Hollywood is a place where dreams are made true, literally. The trash Hollywood produces is becoming so bad, that more Americans are staying home and catching a good nights worth of sleep.

Hollywood and politics is another reason why to avoid a career in this vile town, as if you believe in freedom, life, the second amendment, capitalism, conservatism, or even that taxes should be low on the American populace, you should be prepared to have your career cut short, regardless of how talented an actor or actress you have become. Not to mention Hollywood is not like the rest of the Nation in terms of ideology, 40% of all actors and actresses are not Conservatives, you would be lucky to find just 10%.

Oh, and if you hate dictators and dictatorships, Hollywood is not the place for you. Hollywood celebrities are often visiting their dictator friends in Cuba and other South American hell holes, and if you oppose their environmentalist wacko views, you are a fascist, even though they are the ones rubbing elbows with the fascists.

Enough. Why the hell am I writing this article? We already know Hollywood is literally the scum of the earth, except for Spider man movies. The reason, is because of the news that has come out of Hollywood today, see Sean Penn's good pal, Hugo Chavez, is going to allow his American traitor/friend make a film in the authoritarian land.

President Hugo Chavez said he met privately with actor Sean Penn on Wednesday, and that the Oscar-winning celebrity may film a movie in Venezuela.

Penn may shoot a film based on a novel by Cuban writer Alejo Carpentier, which is set largely in the jungle along Venezuela's southern Orinoco river, Chavez said. He appeared to be referring to Carpentier's 1953 novel, "The Lost Steps," about an American anthropologist and composer's journey into the jungle region

If an American actor had done this during World War II, they would have been branded a traitor, yet today, they are praised for meeting with dictators who steal peoples lives, monies, and freedoms.

-- Tim K.

Vote in Our Poll: Would You Support Jim Demint for President if Nominated by the GOP in 2012?

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Congressman Grayson Briefly Spent Time in Mental Hospital in 1980s

Former Keller Aide Explains Grayson's 2008 Win
Charles Nelson

Alan Grayson has swiftly become one of the most noticeable members of the 111th Congress. The Florida Democrat narrowly beat his Republican challenger, Ric Keller in the 2008 race for the Congressional seat. Grayson was notable in that he funded his own campaign with personal funds.

Congressman Grayson has described himself as a "proud progressive" and has been listed on's list of the most influential members of the Democratic Party. Grayson first made waves in September by stating that the Republican response to the pending health care legislation was for people to "die quickly."

Grayson also called Fox News an enemy of the United States and called Linda Robertson, an aide to Federal Reserve Chief Ben Bernanke and former Enron lobbyist a "K-Street whore." Grayson has not retracted the statements and is coming under intense scrutiny from conservative media sources.

With Grayson's erratic behavior has also been seen as a growing embarrassment to the Democratic establishment. New York Congressman Anthony Weiner was quoted by Politico as saying that his colleague was "one fry short of a happy meal." Other Democrats, including New Jersey Rep Bill Pascrell have criticized Grayson's outlandish behavior.

After Grayson's latest outburst became public, former Keller aide Johann Kipling told the Saint Petersburg Times that the 2008 Keller campaign had unearthed curious inconsistencies in Grayson's professional career.

Kipling's statements were chronicled in an interview set to be released on November 5. Kipling stated that while Grayson touted that he was a respected economist he had actually failed an economics course in his sophomore year. In addition, some of Grayson's senior papers were accused of widespread plagiarism.

In addition, Kipling stated that Grayson's campaign had a glaring omission. During 1988, when Grayson had just turned thirty and while working for the Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson law firm, he spent four days in the Psychiatric Institute of Washington. What the cause of this stay was is yet unclear, although testimony from co-workers suggests that Grayson was extremely combative with fellow employees, including slapping a female intern in the face. Grayson was released after PIW doctors declared him "not to be a threat to the public."

Asked why the Keller campaign did not release this information, Kipling stated that it was the decision of Keller himself. Keller was a four-term Congressman before the insurgent Grayson captured 52% of the vote in 2008.

Congressman Cao, Conservatives favorite Moderate.

While some claim that Conservative Republicans want to purge the party of all moderates & liberals who are present in the party, which is 100% incorrect, as we want a party which is overwhelmingly Conservative, however, in some areas of the country we will accept our moderate Republican counterparts with open arms.

Those same idiots forget to mention that we do like some "moderate" Republicans.

Take for example Republican Congressman Joseph Cao (pronounced GOW for those that did not read this press release) who defeated the corrupt Democrat Congressman William "cold cash" Jefferson in Louisiana's second congressional district, and now represents the district in the House of Representatives. While Congressman Cao has only voted with Republicans 77% of time, including votes against the stimulus package, " cap & tax" legislation, and his opposition to the health care legislation in Congress, Cao has become the "Moderate" darling of the Conservative blogosphere.

How could this be? According to the Main Stream Media, Liberal Democrats, and even some Republicans, all Conservative Republicans and the blogosphere which we belong to, just hate all moderate Republicans who have ever been elected to Congress, or born for that matter. Well, Congressman Cao has received our support for numerous reasons.

1.Congressman Cao defeated the corrupt William "cold cash" Jefferson, and Cao is the only Republican who can win in this district. Not to mention, he is just a regular American attempting to help in the United States Congress.

2.Congressman Cao is a staunch opponent to abortion, which is why he joined the Republican party in the first place.

3.Congressman Cao opposes the current health care legislation in the United States House of Representatives because it will contain abortion in the bill, even though he knows he will probably lose his campaign all because of his personal values. As Cao later said, "but I have to live with myself, and I always reflect on the phrase of the New Testament, ‘How does it profit a man’s life to gain the world but to lose his soul.".

Now, Congressman Cao is back in the news, as he joins the campaign in support of Bob McDonnell's Gubernatorial bid in Virginia, hoping to bring Vietnamese-Americans out to the polls on Election day, in support of Bob McDonnell, a fine Conservative Republican who leads his Democratic opponent by double digits with one week to election day.

Congressman Cao is my favorite Moderate Republican, so to those that say we Conservatives do not like our Moderate brothers in the Republican party, why don't you just shut up, and do the world a favor.

Cao falls on the sword for Conservatism -

Cao campaigns for Bob McDonnell's campaign in Virginia -

--Tim K.

Monday, October 26, 2009


According to a new poll released by the Club for Growth, Doug Hoffman now leads in New Yorks 23rd congressional district special election! While I have been expecting Hoffman to slowly surge into second place, for a hell of an election finale, it appears Hoffman has surged beyond all of my expectations. Read my interview with the candidate yesterday.

Doug Hoffman (C) - 31.3% of the vote.
Bill Owens (D) - 27.0% of the vote.
"Dede" Scozzafava - 19.7% of the vote.
Undecided - 22.0% of the vote.

Let the Conservative revolution begin! It is time for Scozzafava to drop out of the election, and it is time for the Republican party to embrace the only real Conservative Republican in the race!

Source : The Club for Growth,

--Tim K.

Sunday, October 25, 2009

An Interview with Doug Hoffman, Conservative for Congress

Fellow Conservatives & Republicans across the Internet, I have just completed an interview with Conservative candidate for the United States Congress in New York's 23rd congressional district, Doug Hoffman. Though the interview lasted just eight minutes, I am really impressed with this candidate, and I have been following his campaign for months.

Mr.Hoffman was generous enough to keep the answers on a yes or no basis, however, when it comes to the Republican party, he really cannot contain his desire for a Reagan Republican party.

Question : Do you support General McChrystals request to increase troop levels in Afghanistan?

Answer : Yes.

Question : Do you support abolishing the estate tax?

Answer : Yes.

Question : If elected to Congress, will you run in the 2010 Republican primary?

Answer : Yes.

Question : If you are not elected to Congress, will you run for Congress next November?

Answer : Possibly.

Question : Do you believe in a strong Conservative Republican party, or a third party?

Answer : My campaign is to reclaim the heart & soul of the Republican party, I am a Reagan Republican.

Question : Do you support or oppose H.R. 3200, the "public option" bill in the House of Representatives.

Answer : Opposed, in all of its variations.

Question : Do you expect more Congressional Republicans to support your campaign within the next 9 days?

Answer : Absolutely yes.

Thank you Mr.Hoffman for this interview, it sure means a lot.

-- Tim K.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Michele Bachmann endorses Hoffman.

24 hours ago, I wrote about how Congresswoman Bachmann endorsing Doug Hoffman would be excellent, today it is being reported that Congresswoman Bachmann has endorsed Doug Hoffman for Congress, becoming the first Republican to publicly endorse Hoffman over Scozzafava.

Rep. Michele Bachmann, the iconoclastic Minnesota congresswoman becomes, as far as I can tell, the first incumbent Republican to back the Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman over Republican Dede Scozzafava in the roiling NY-23 special election. On her radio show yesterday, Laura Ingraham skillfully pushed Bachmann to take a stand on the race — the answer seemed to come by accident.

“What I read,” said Bachmann, “is that the Republican-endorsed candidate is actually number three. The Democrat is number one and the conservative candidate is number two.” (This was not actually true in the last poll, which showed Democrat Bill Owens leading Scozzafava, and Hoffman bringing up the rear.)

Nudged by Ingraham, Bachmann threw Scozzafava under the bus. “Hoffman is on the ascendancy,” she said, “and we have to win this seat, and people need to get behind the winning candidate, and it looks like that’s Hoffman.” After Ingraham said that Bachmann had just made an endorsement, the congresswoman didn’t correct her: “It appears that he has the best chance right now.”

Doug Hoffman 2009! When I say Michele Bachmann is the first Republican Congressman to come out and endorse Hoffman, the fact a large majority of Republicans in Congress have not even sent Scozzafava one dime, proves to me that there is a silent majority of Republicans who want their true comrade to win, Doug Hoffman.

-- Tim K.

McDonnell should win Virginia race easily.

With just 12 days to election day 2009, Republican candidate for Governor in Virginia's Gubernatorial election, Bob McDonnell, has little to fear from his Democratic rival, Creigh Deeds, as his campaign is running on fumes, and recent polling data has Deeds trailing McDonnell in some polls by more then 10% percentage points.

According to SurveyUSA, if the Gubernatorial election we're held today in Virginia, Republican Bob McDonnell would win the Governor's house by near 20% of the vote.

59% - Bob McDonnell.
40% - Creigh Deeds.
1% - Undecided.

Among younger Virginians aged 18-34, the results are even more surprising.

61% - Bob McDonnell.
37% - Creigh Deeds.
2% - Undecided.

Republican Bob McDonnell has been smeared viciously by the Washington Post and other liberal smear merchants, however, his goals of fiscal conservatism , an all of the above energy plan, and the fact he is not a Democrat, is pushing McDonnell to reclaim the Virginia governors house, a house Republicans have been locked out of since 2001 in Virginia.

This Gubernatorial race will revitalize the Conservative Republican movement for the 2010 elections, and this Gubernatorial race will bring the state of Virginia back to its Conservative roots, especially since a majority of Virginians disapprove of Obama's job through nine months.

Bob McDonnell 09! Let the Conservative Republican Revolution begin!

-- Tim K.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

5 reasons to support David Harmer for Congress

Author's note - this is the third of a series of articles, listing five reasons why you should support Republican candidates seeking elected office across the Nation, this series has previously featured Bob McDonnell & Chris Christie.

With the nomination of Democratic Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher to a high level position in the Obama administration, a special election has been called for the vacant congressional seat in California's tenth congressional district, a traditionally liberal district, however, with a special election looming, anything can happen.

Republican David Harmer is seeking to replace Tauscher in the United States Congress, restore Conservatism to the district, and ride on a wave of anti-government feelings which has circulated across the Nation. While Harmer might have more momentum then Republicans have previously had while running in this district, the district is D+11, supported Obama with 64% of the vote, and the Democrat candidate is the current Lt.Governor of California.

Despite all of the above mentioned, Harmer is running a special election, which guarantees a tighter election then normal, especially if Harmer can get out the Republican vote, and use the Democrat candidates status as a member of a failing administration against him to rile up feelings.

Without further delay, here are the official five reasons to support Republican David Harmer's bid to become California's next Congressman from the 10th congressional district.

  1. God knows, we need all of the business experience we can get in Washington D.C. right now, which is the largest reason why we should all support David Harmer. Harmer is a independent businessman who has become very successful in a state which demoralizes most business owners.
  2. Harmer believes in the "all of the above" energy approach, and opposes the "cap & tax" legislation which passed the House of Representatives several months ago. His energy approach is an oddity in California, however, it is welcomed.
  3. Harmer is a National Security Conservative, once again, something which has become an oddity in the state of California, however, it is welcomed. Especially since his campaign page directly mentions the dangerous nuclear threats of Iran & North Korea.
  4. Harmer opposes all of the big government spending policies which have gone through Congress over the past nine months, he realizes that common sense fiscal Conservatism is needed, unlike his opponent.
  5. Harmer has never been elected to public office, is just a man attempting to the right thing for his four children. Harmer does not believe in big government, socialized medicine, imprisoning our children in trillions of dollars of debt, or taking away our freedom. David Harmer is the Conservative Republican candidate for Congress in this district, which is why he needs our support.

David Harmer is a businessman, one who understands we need to use the energy we got as well as other energies in development, opposes the "cap & tax" legislation, believes in National Security and addressing the threats in Iran & North Korea, is an oddity in California politics, is against big government spending, and in the end, is just a regular guy doing this for his kids.

Please support David Harmer anyway you can, whether it be through voting for him, supporting his campaign through talking with friends or a political contribution, we need folks like David Harmer in Congress now.

-- Tim K.

Obama adminstration : Voting Democrat is needed for black Americans to have "candidate of choice"

Authors note : While I never stop talking about elections, I hardly ever discuss election laws. Just to summarize my positions on election laws, I believe all primaries should be closed to members of that party only, that Churches should be allowed to discuss politics and endorse candidates, I also believe in the New York styled "fusion politics", however, for the state level only.

Last year, Kinston Noth Carolina voted by a 65-35% margin to end their "partisan" local elections, and replace their local elections with a non-partisan style, like most villages have in Upstate New York. Well, Obama's Department of Justice will not allow the election law change to occur, based purely on racism.

Voters in this small city decided overwhelmingly last year to do away with the party affiliation of candidates in local elections, but the Obama administration recently overruled the electorate and decided that equal rights for black voters cannot be achieved without the Democratic Party.

The Justice Department’s ruling, which affects races for City Council and mayor, went so far as to say partisan elections are needed so that black voters can elect their “candidates of choice” – identified by the department as those who are Democrats and almost exclusively black.

The department ruled that white voters in Kinston will vote for blacks only if they are Democrats and that therefore the city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters’ right to elect the candidates they want.

The nonsense just posted above, makes me want to puke! Equal voting rights cannot be achieved without the Democrat party? That is like saying equal voting rights cannot be achieved for white voters without the Republican party. Well, all blacks "candidates of choice" are fellow black Democrats? Is that not political racism? Is that not downright wrong?

Also, how would that violate their right to elect the candidates they want? Those candidates can still run, the voters can still cast their ballots, perhaps they could call the candidate, and ask "what do you believe, what is your political affiliation, etc.", creating more involvement in the electoral process.

This is idiotic. I personally believe all elections should be partisan to increase involvement, however, if a City or Town wants to change their election laws, why the hell does the Department of Justice have to clear it in the 21st century? I don't think we have to worry about Democrats denying black voters registration rights anymore. Also, was it necessary for the Department of Justice to insult all of the black voters in Kinston North Carolina?

Insanity, just pure insanity.

-- Tim K.

Michael Steele is not loved by Republicans.

Michael Steele, the elected Chairman of the Republican National Committee as of earlier this year, does not have great approval numbers from within his party. The former Lt.Governor and Republican candidate for Senator in Maryland, Steele is the first black Chairman of the Republican National Committee, and after being elected to that position, faced vicious & ugly attacks from the left.

Steele has had some bright spots while Chairman, however, he has made a lot of troubling moves during his tenure. As Steele has made some confusing remarks on abortion, believes that "potato salad" will help diversify the Republican party, did not defend Congressman Roy Blunt from a vile attack by a Conservative talk show host, and for his all around not-Conservative enough stances on the issues. Steele has made good comments in regards to Obama winning the Nobel peace Prize, "What has President Obama actually accomplished? It is unfortunate that the president's star power has outshined tireless advocates who have made real achievements working towards peace and human rights", however, the list of good moves is short.

In all fairness, Chairman Steele cannot be 100% evaluated to the 2010 elections are completed, as his leadership during those vital elections will shape whether or not he is elected to a second term as Chairman, and what Republicans really think of him, including myself.

According to a Rasmussen Reports poll on what Republicans think about Chairman Steele, the results are good, but not great.

38% of Republicans have a favorable opinion of Steele.
27% of Republicans have a unfavorable opinion of Steele.
35% of Republicans are unsure.

While a 38% favorable opinion is good, the fact 27% of the party does not approve of you, and 35% of the party is unsure, raises questions as to the performance of the Chairman, when he cannot even reach the 40% favorable barrier.

I personally believe South Carolina's Republican Chairman, Katon Dawson, should have been elected Chairman of the RNC, because he is a Conservative Republican who will stand up for the key values of the Republican party, and he knows how to bring all Republicans to the table (regardless of race), and it is with the issues, not potato salad.

-- Tim K.

GOP State Senator supports removal of Monserrate.

Senator Monserrate, the Democratic State Senator in New York who was convicted of dragging his girlfriend through her apartment last week, but did not receive a conviction on intentionally stabbing her (when he did), has received a backlash from the public, as they want him out of office. Well there is a movement amongst fellow New York State Senators to rightly expel Monserrate from the Senate, and I have at least one confirmed Republican Senator who supports expulsion.

Republican State Senator, Jim Seward of the 51st Senate district (in full disclaimer, my State Senator) wrote to me in an email this afternoon, that Monserrate should resign immediately, or be kicked out of the Senate for good.

Thank you for contacting my office concerning Sen. Hiram Monserrate’ s
conviction of a misdemeanor count of assault. I appreciate hearing from

Sen. Monserrate should resign from the senate immediately. As a convicted
violent offender, he has no place as a member of the New York State Senate.

If he does not resign, I will support efforts to expel him from the senate.

Senator Monserrate is a disgrace, and should be removed by any means possible. I support Senator Seward's call for expulsion without question. If you are from New York, what does your State Senator think on this subject? If you are unsure, you should find out pronto.

If Senate Republicans are unable to remove Monserrate, I hope the voters in his Queen's district will, however, I highly doubt that will happen in such a Democratic voting bloc. But, local Republicans better have a good candidate running, because this scum needs to be defeated.

-- Tim K.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Vote in Our Poll: Who Would You Vote For in the NY-23 Race?

Megan Fox Just Isn't that Hot

If I'm the first man to say it, it must be said: while good looking, Megan Fox is definitely not one of the hottest women in popular American culture. She just isn't. She's pretty good looking, whatever, but I don't see what people see in her. The media makes her seem like sex on wheels. There are so many more attractive women in the world; I don't understand all the attention. For example:

Who is better looking...
Megan Fox

or Catherine Zeta-Jones

or Elizabeth Hurley
or Julie Banderas

Case closed, Conan.

Obama Administration Asks FCC to Fine Fox News

FOX Facing Nearly $30 Million in Indecency Fines
Charles Glass
Huffington Post
October 20, 2009

President Barack Obama's Administration has declared from the beginning that one of its key goals is to return civility to the political arena. Over the course of nine months in office, the Obama White House has spoken to famed conservatives such as George Will and William Kristol and has displayed a new sense of openness with the White House Press Corps.

However, there have been increasing vitriolic attacks made on the White House by some in the broadcast media, especially FOXNews and other right-wing arms of the Republican Party. Some of the worst attacks come from Glenn Beck, the weepy radio host who regularly calls President Obama a "Kenyan" and once referred to former green jobs administrator Van Jones as a "monkey."

Other examples litter the FOX landscape. Bill O'Reilly's Factor is infamous for accusing the Administration of freeing pedophiles while regularly praising former President George Bush. Sean Hannity shows "government waste" on his show, often not totaling a million dollars, but is yet to criticize the $3 trillion waste better known as the Iraq War.

For all of these rabid right-wing attacks, the White House has become more cognizant of the American people. Recognizing that the American people are firmly against FOX's racist and bigoted attacks, the Administration is now directly challenging the "news" organization.

In a press release given to the Huffington Post and other press outlets this morning, White House Communications Director Anita Dunn stated that the Federal Communications Commission was asked to fine the FOX Corporation for violations of the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005. This came after repeated racist and derogatory attacks made on FOXNews over the last two years.

In accordance with the 2005 law, every time the network featured a "particularly offensive" or "flagrantly untruthful" segment, a fine is levied. White House officials estimate the 2008-2009 fine to be nearing $29 million.

While FOX, owned by NewsCorp, is likely not to go into bankruptcy over the fines, it is called a "lesson in decency" by Ms. Dunn.

Dunn stated that the White House is considering asking the FCC to revoke or suspend FOX's privilege to broadcast on cable television. This appears unlikely at the moment, due to a lack of precedent.

"We cannot allow lies so flagrantly over the airwaves." Dunn stated in the release. "It is just like the propaganda that is used by foreign dictatorships. It is bordering on un-American."

EDIT: 12:50 pm: HuffPo link down. Hmm....

Scozzafava's campaign is officially running on nothing.

The supposed Republican candidate for Congress in New York's 23rd congressional district, Assemblywoman "Dede" Scozzafava, is in the midst of a campaign spiraling out of control. Her campaign is just as liberal as the Democrat's campaign, she had a spy asking Conservative candidate Doug Hoffman questions the other week, disguised as a reporter, she is a sinking ship who is dragging down Republican hopes to keep the district in their hands, and she is even calling the police on Conservative bloggers.

Tonight, Dede Scozzafava, the Republican candidate for the November 3 special election in the 23rd congressional district, spoke to about 100 Republicans at the Lewis County GOP dinner at the Elks Lodge 1605. After a dinner of turkey, mashed potatoes, and stuffing, Scozzafava fended off criticism that she wasn't as conservative as third-party candidate Doug Hoffman and urged her supporters to vote for her in order to keep her Democratic opponent Bill Owens from serving as a rubber stamp for Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama's agenda in Washington. It was a fairly typical evening--until the speech ended and someone with Scozzafava's campaign called the police. On me.

The rest is a must read over at the Weekly Standard.

Not sure how Scozzafava could claim she is Conservative, considering she supports card check legislation which would make it easier for unions to threaten workers into unionization, she is as liberal as they come on social issues, she has no economic understanding as she supports the stimulus package, when all 178 (177 voted, one was late to the vote) Republicans in the House opposed it, has been supported by the ACORN associated "Working Families Party", etc. etc. etc.

Look, if the Republican party & Conservative activists want to retain the 23rd congressional district in Republican hands, they must elect Doug Hoffman to the United States Congress, as he is the only electable Republican in the election, he is the only Conservative candidate who the voters can resonate with, and he will caucus with the Republicans and the Republican Study Committee as well.

Does anyone find it interesting that Congressman John McHugh has not commented on this special election? While Congressman McHugh was not the most Conservative Republican in the House of Representatives, he does have a respectable 71% rating from the American Conservative Union, was a good pro-life Conservative, and opposes card check without question.

Scozzafava cannot even commit to staying in her own party, do we really want her handling literal life & death decisions in Washington D.C. to the future of our Nation? I don't think so, Doug Hoffman 09!

Also, check out this website as well

The most stimulating Republican to run for office....

The people of New Jersey now have the opportunity to elect the most stimulating Republican candidate for elected office, ever. The stimulation comes from the business which she runs.

(HT) -

One campaign for the New Jersey Legislature is off to an arousing start.

Stepfanie Velez-Gentry, a Republican from Bellmawr running for state Assembly, makes a living hosting sex-toy parties.

As the owner of Nookie Parties, she organizes gatherings for women and couples in which she sells sex toys, lotions, games, lingerie and other erotic items.

"It's kind of like a Tupperware party, but with adult novelties," the 29-year-old mother of two said.

While the career choice of Ms.Velez-Gentry is not exactly Conservative, and the New Jersey Assembly district is one of the least to cross-over into Republican hands, I actually support Ms.Velez-Gentry without question, as her goals include making the state more business friendly, improving education without big government involvement or wasting taxpayer dollars, etc. Ms.Velez-Gentry is a Conservative Republican candidate worthy of Conservative & Republican support.

Stepfanie Velez-Gentry for New Jersey Assembly -

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Number one sign America is in trouble.

It has absolutely nothing to do with unemployment, increasing foreclosure rates, higher taxes, lower tax revenues, the shrinking of America's economy, or the fact Obama wants to enslave us all into government welfare.

It has to do with the almighty American dollar, which is becoming even weaker & useless every day, Gold is rising in value each and every day, and the American dollar is becoming so weak, the Canadian dollar which we have made fun of for literally decades in America, is nearly worth as much as the American dollar now.

The Canadian currency, nicknamed the loonie for the aquatic bird on the C$1 coin, appreciated 0.5 percent to C$1.0370 per U.S. dollar yesterday in Toronto, from C$1.0422 on Oct. 9. One Canadian dollar buys 96.44 U.S. cents. The currency climbed to $1.0207 on Oct. 15, the strongest level since July 29, 2008. The loonie and the U.S. dollar last traded on a one-for-one basis on July 22, 2008.

As Washington D.C. continues to devalue our dollar, the Canadian dollar is almost worth the same as the American dollar (keep this in mind, our currency use to squash the Canadian currency, now the Canadian currency is growing, as ours is devaluing), if that does not prove our economic situation is in trouble, I don't know what does.

-- Tim K.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Doug Hoffman surges in polls, time for Scozzafava to step aside.

If Republicans want to maintain New York's 23rd congressional district, I would recommend the Republican candidate, Assemblywoman "Dede" Scozzafava drop out of the special election being held to replace Republican Congressman John McHugh, and endorse Conservative candidate for Congress, Doug Hoffman. This is no longer a third party candidate which Republicans can dismiss, because Doug Hoffman is not a third party obstructionist, he is the only true Republican in the special congressional election.

According to a new poll released by the Siena Research Institute, Scozzafava is losing more support each and every day, Hoffman is gaining support, and Owens is sitting silently on the sidelines letting Republicans bicker amongst themselves.

Bill Owens (D) - 33%
"Dede" Scozzafava (R) - 29%
Doug Hoffman (C) - 23%
Undecided - 15%.

Doug Hoffman is leading Independent voters, has the backing of 27% of Republican voters, and has surged seven percentage points over the past few weeks, while Scozzafava has lost six percentage points over the past few weeks, the only Republican candidate with serious backing, funding, grassroots support, and resonates with the district is Doug Hoffman.

The time has come for Scozzafava to decide whether or not she will place keeping the district in Republican hands (Doug Hoffman is a Republican, will caucus with Republicans, join the Republican Study Committee), or if she will let a historically Republican district fall into Democratic hands, because of her liberal views which are exactly the same as the Democrat candidate.

Easy decision - Republican control of 23rd congressional district or Democrat control of 23rd congressional district, I prefer Republican control, which is why I call on Scozzafava to end her campaign for Congress, and do the right thing, what the Republican Chairs should have done months ago, support Doug Hoffman for Congress.

I would like to thank R.S. McCain for his support of Doug Hoffman, as he joins such bloggers as Erick Erickson, and American Patriots such as Fred Thompson in supporting the only Conservative Republican in this election. God Bless.

-- Tim K.

57% of Americans would not vote to re-elect Obama.

All across the Conservative blogosphere and Fox News, the headline "Fox News Poll : 43 Percent would vote to re-elect President Obama" is being touted, however, I believe that headline is incorrect, rather the headline should be "Fox News Poll : 57% would not vote to re-elect President Obama". Barack Obama is in trouble, his agenda is going against the will of the American people, his administration is one of the most corrupt we have ever seen, and his foreign policy is of appeasement, not strength.

Americans do not like what Obama has to offer, and thus they are feeling buyers remorse. With three years to election day, it appears Obama is in worse shape to be re-elected then President Bush ever was leading up to his re-election. I guess that proves who was more popular over the long run, however, we must not get ahead of ourselves, election day is in three years, and the American people are like the wind....they change at a seconds notice, especially Independents.

I believe the approval/disapproval of Congress is even more revealing, as 66% of Americans disapprove of the job the United States Congress is doing, this should also be relevant to Obama, because the job they disapprove of, is his agenda being pushed through Congress. If only Americans had this attitude last year about Obama, if only they we're more attentive to the facts of what Obama believed, we could have avoided this altogether.

Then again, perhaps the old saying "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me" will resonate with the American people in 2012, hopefully they will not be fooled by the sham that Obama is a "moderate" again in 2012, and will elect a real Conservative to office.

-- Tim K.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Birthers are officially pinheads.

Where is Bill O'Reilly when you really need him?

On the behalf of Bill O'Reilly, I would like to award the entire birther movement with the honor of being pinheads, while you we're pinheads from the beginning, you have officially hit rock bottom. How could that be some might ask, considering some birthers believe Obama was born before Hawaii became a state, and his mother changed the birth records because she knew one day he would be running for President............

Well the birthers now have real proof Obama was born in Kenya.

What is the magical new proof that Barack Obama was born in Kenya? A very old article published in a Kenyan news website (they forget to include the article was originally written by the Associated Press), in which the article states, "Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barack Obama", REAL PROOF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I guess since he was born with a Kenyan bloodline..........that means he was born in Kenya, because he is Kenyan born......with a Kenyan bloodline. Wait a minute I am confused, that is like saying if a Serbian newspaper wrote "A Serbian born United States blogger, Mr.K" or if a Greek newspaper wrote "A Greek born United States blogger is Greek", because both of the above are true. I am of Serbian heritage, he is of Greek heritage.

Kenyan heritage = Kenyan born if you think about it. Though, I am one who looks at the Nation of which you we're born, a lot of folks base it on your ancestry. If you go by Obama's ancestors, he is Kenyan born.

Please do check out the article for yourself,

I will continue to fight the Obama administration on the issues, the birthers can continue to derail our momentum against the Obama administration by focusing their time and efforts on a myth.

-- Tim K.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Obama Allowing Russians to Inspect Nuclear Sites!

Yes, I wish that this was a satire piece, but unfortunately it appears that this is real. President Obama's Administration is going to allow Russia to inspect our nuclear facilities-- within the United States. This is an unprecedented move that damages US national security. Not only does it lift the veil of secrecy, but if Russia decided to sell the secret information to terrorists or rogue states, attacks could follow.

This is a disgrace.

This comes as Russia is not going to push for further Iran sanctions, despite stating that they might several weeks ago. This also comes after President Obama pulled missiles from Poland and the Czech Republic, ostensibly to gain a deal with Russia over Iran.

So the Obama Administration is backing off on Poland, the Czech Republic, and Georgia... and Russia is hankering to take Crimea away from the Ukraine. The Russians have also threatened to block shipments to our troops in Afghanistan.

This plan makes absolutely no sense. It's none of any other nations' business what our nuclear stockpile is or how it's configured. Like I said before, it's a disgrace.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Cheney 2012?

I understand that Dick Cheney is everyone's favorite boogeyman, but perhaps his ideas are being proven right as time goes on. Since President Obama took office in January, Cheney challenged Obama's assertions. Obama gladly fired back, but was quickly rebuffed about Afghanistan, surveillance, and Guantanamo Bay. Damaged, Obama backed off. Heck, even some people like the guy.

So now Cheney has increased his favorability ratings while damaging Obama's. But is he ready for the White House? Probably not. He'll be 71 in 2012.

But that won't stop his daughter.

Liz Cheney is organizing to challenge the Obama Administration. Her new political committee will be able to not only spread information, but support candidates, and raise money.

This group, Keep America Safe focuses on the issues regarding foreign policy. Its unabashedly pro-American point of view is refreshing in light of the Obama Administration's constant apologies.

Check out this bitchin' video:

Looks like we've got something serious on the block!

What liberals think of our servicemen.

We all know that liberals have a very poor opinion of American soldiers, especially those that are currently fighting for our freedoms against the most vile and evil of scum in Afghanistan & Iraq. Well, apparently a liberal Congressman has stooped down to a new low, calling an American hero, "white trash", while attempting to intimidate a Hispanic leader in Kansas' third congressional district to support him instead of Daniel Gilyeat, a disabled Iraq veteran running for the Republican nomination.

Congressman Dennis Moore is the sleazeball who called his Republican Veteran opponent "white trash". I ask that all Republicans in the third congressional district in Kansas, support Daniel Gilyeat during the primary, and all that can....please donate money to his campaign.

God Bless Daniel Gilyeat for his service to this Nation, in which he lost one of his legs while fighting for our freedoms in Iraq, but may God Bless Daniel Gilyeat as he attempts to further serve the American people if elected to the United States House of Representatives.

Little Green Footballs 2.0 has the rest of the story,

-- Tim K.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Yo Obama, it's either victory or defeat!

As the Generals report is becoming a true waste, caused by the lack of attention by the supposed Commander in Chief, the ignorance of the Democratic party, and the disgusting lack of support from the American people, it is becoming clear that there are only two paths in regards to the Generals report ; Victory or defeat.

The situation in Afghanistan is at dire levels, a massive Iraq-like troop surge is needed as soon as possible in order to secure victory, however, with a supposed Commander in Chief who has a problem with the term "victory" , I question whether or not America has a Military leader which will do what is necessary to secure victory for America, and defeat for our enemies.

The Riehl World View has a very depressing article posted on their website this morning, in which it appears that Obama is choosing politics over the lives of American soldiers in Afghanistan, who need reinforcements ASAP from their government, instead.....their government appears to be leaning towards a "middle ground" approach to the war in Afghanistan, which would mean no new troops, and perhaps no new hope.

I am in no way, shape or form calling for any of Americas troops to be called home if Obama does nothing, because I realize the cost if we allow the terrorists to succeed in Afghanistan against the greatest Military on earth. It would mean Afghanistan would return to a state of Islamo-Fascism, terrorism would skyrocket, and the United States would no longer be a world power which can defeat any enemy. Former Secretary of State, Condi Rice warned Americans about this a few weeks ago, correctly stating that surrender in Afghanistan, would mean another 9/11 in America.

Mr.President, demand that our Generals get the troops they need, or resign!

Riehl World View -

-- Tim K.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Vote in Our Poll: Lieberman v. Chafee

'Israel Cannot Prevent Iran from a Nuke'

This interview is with Glen, the editor of the Religion of Peace, a site meant to expose the jihadist agenda.

1. Osama bin Laden and many leaders of militant Islam have stated that their goal is to create a global caliphate. However, many in the American and Western world ignore this. Why do you think that people still don't recognize these plans?

People in the West have been trained by the media and political leaders to ignore the religious motives of Islamic terrorists and focus merely on the threat posed to security. Many Muslims do not want to believe the worst about their own religion, and those in positions of influence are happy to abet in the cover-up – either because they genuinely believe that innocent Muslims will be victimized if the truth about Islam is known, or because they recognize an opportunity to associate terrorism with the cost of disregarding policies that are remarkably consistent with their own anti-Western (or anti-Israel) agenda.

The belief that Islam has nothing to do with Islamic terrorism may be silly, but, for many, it is certainly preferable to the idea that millions of their fellow citizens harbor an ideology that makes them potential terrorists. It is more comfortable to think of Islam as just another religion, the rough edges of which can simply be smoothed out over time by the liberal values of tolerance and generosity.

2. Which terrorist organization do you believe has the most potential to damage US interests?

I guess it depends on how “interests” is defined. I believe that al-Qaeda represents the greatest immediate threat to our economy, since that is the ambition to which they are devoting their substantial resources. For example, they are now developing a technique in which explosives are literally hidden within a bomber’s body, which could make it impossible to stop suicide attacks on certain public venues.

The greatest threat to Western civilization, however, doesn’t come from the terrorists, but rather from the tens of millions of Muslim immigrants (and successive generations) who are using our laws and tolerance against us to achieve social change that slowly erodes our children’s future with each concession.

This is not to say that every Muslim is evil or even aware of this demographic battle, of course, but if we want to preserve our liberty and values, then we should not be importing a religion that is so blatantly opposed to what we hold dear.

3. Which nation (except Israel) do you foresee becoming a major leader against terrorism?

I’ve never been accused of being an optimist, so you’ll understand that I don’t hold out much hope for any particular Muslim nation to exhibit great leadership in the struggle against global terrorism. As the example of (formerly Christian) Lebanon in our lifetime so plainly illustrates, tolerance for Islamic terror is proportionate to Muslim influence.

Non-Muslim countries that are battling violent Islamist insurgencies are India, Russia, Thailand and the Philippines. China would be facing a problem as well if not for the fact that it is so effectively suppressing the discontent of its Muslim minority by completely disregarding human rights. For its part, Europe seems to have decided to go out with a whimper.

4. Could you foresee Russia allying itself with Islamist forces? (despite Chechyna, of course)

Russia has been playing a dangerous game with Islam, particularly in regard to its cozy relationship with Iran. There has also been a great deal of pandering to the leaders and people of other Muslim countries, as well as to Muslims within its own borders – which make up a rapidly expanding minority.

Since our former foe is acting in its own economic and political interests with no regard for long-term consequences, it’s difficult to say where or when the line may be drawn.

5. How likely is it that Iran will acquire a nuclear warhead?

Just as Pakistan developed nuclear weapons capability, so will Iran. I don’t think Israel alone can prevent this from happening, and there simply isn’t enough willpower on the part of others, including the Obama administration. In fact, the “negotiations” that are getting underway between the U.S. and Iran should provide the mullahs with just enough time to complete their project.

6. Which nations in the Islamic world appear at least somewhat likely to suffer an Islamist takeover?

Well, I think we can pretty much stick a fork in Somalia. And it is only the presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan that keeps the Taliban from regaining power there as well. For its part, Pakistan may not be run by clerics, technically speaking, but the concessions made to Islamists over the past several years by the military and government are barely distinguishable from outright capitulation.

Other than that, the Islamists are held in check largely by the ruthlessness of Muslim governments. The world turns a blind eye to human rights violations in countries like Egypt, for example, because it is known that the consequences of imposing such standards – as was done with the Shah of Iran – are much worse. In the case of Iran, the mullahs quickly installed a far more brutal regime that began with executing the very human rights activists who catapulted them to power in the first place.

Monday, October 5, 2009

Outrage: Obama Refuses to Meet Dalai Lama

President Barack Obama has broken with presidential precedent and has refused to meet with the Dalai Lama. The Dalai Lama is the chief of the Buddhist faith and is also the acting head of state for Tibet, which China invaded in 1950.

The Dalai Lama is well-seen in many parts of American life and was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize. Obama is the first President not to meet with the religious leader since 1991.

Obama perhaps believes that this move will placate China. Considering the relatively small power of the Lama, this sends the signal that Obama is willing to throw overboard leaders who are friendly to the US to appease hostile states.

This would be similar to President Reagan refusing to meet with Pope John Paul II during the height of the Cold War in order to make the Soviet Union happy. This would be absurd then and is terrible now.

Obama wants help in Iran, but this is not the move that will do it. Instead, it will isolate democratic Taiwan and political dissidents in China. It shames the memory of the Tienanmen Square protests and their horrific deaths.

GOP Congressman Frank Wolf stated: "It's against the law to even have a picture of the Dalai Lama. I can almost hear the words of the Chinese guards saying to them that nobody cares about you in the United States."

Obama should profusely apologize for this incredibly stupid and pro-dictator stance.

El Rushbo to buy the St.Louis Rams franchise?

Conservative blogger Doug Powers has posted an interesting article on his website, as it appears that Conservative Icon and top rated talk show host Rush Limbaugh is one of the perspective buyers of the St. Louis Rams franchise, perhaps the most liberal team in all of the National Football League.

According to OpenSecret, when we look at political donations of team officials, coaches, players and employees, the St. Louis Rams are the NFL team that is the most Democrat, with political donations going 98% Democrat and 2% Republican. This seems like an odd fit for Rush, but maybe he could bring them around.

The St. Louis Rams might be the most liberal team in terms of political donations over the past several decades, however, with the most Conservative talk show host bidding to become the owner of the team, I would suspect that Rush would be able to bring them around real quickly.

Some will question why Rush Limbaugh would become involved in the National Football League to the point of becoming the owner, I would ask why not? Rush Limbaugh is a big Conservative & Capitalist, he believes in competition, and what better way to be involved in the Capitalist system based on competition then in the National Football League?

He is the best in radio, perhaps he could be the best in the NFL.

Not to mention, who doesn't want to be the owner of a NFL team?

Doug Powers article -

-- Tim K.

Vote in Our Poll: Choice for GOP in 2012

Sunday, October 4, 2009

5 reasons to support Bob McDonnell for Governor in Virginia.

Author's note : This is a new series of articles, examining the five reasons why Republicans, Conservatives, and Independents alike should support front running GOP candidates across the Nation during the 2009 elections. This first edition will feature Republican candidate for Governor in Virginia.

As you might be aware of, the 2009 Gubernatorial election in Virginia is crucial to the success of the Republican party, the Conservative movement, and the Nation itself. Virginia Attorney General Bob McDonnell was the lone Republican who even sought out nomination to run on the GOP line, the Democrats had three candidates, it appeared to be a another tough election cycle for Republicans in 2009.

Then, the American people spent a few months watching Democrats in Washington D.C., now Republicans & Conservatism is on the tip of every Americans tongue, just waiting to pull the level for GOP candidates across the Nation.

Enter Bob McDonnell, a strong Conservative Republican from the Commonwealth of Virginia, a historically Republican stronghold before the 2008 elections, however, Virginians know McDonnell, and they like what they see. So why should the average Virginian support Bob McDonnell? Just five core reasons.

  1. Bob McDonnell is as big as a second amendment supporter as you will find, he supported the Supreme Court decision on Heller when he was Attorney General, and has thus been endorsed by the National Rifle Association.
  2. Bob McDonnell is a proponent of the "all of the above" energy plan, which has a deep focus on exploration and drilling of natural gas and oil off of the coast of Virginia, support for coal & Nuclear energy, while also supporting green energy at the same time. This will bring energy & jobs to Virginia.
  3. Bob McDonnell is a friend of the taxpayer, as McDonnell cut taxes while in the House of Delegates, supports eliminating the "death tax", and is a foe of wasteful spending. Something that is very appealing during this time of economic insanity in Washington.
  4. Bob McDonnell is not Creigh Deeds, Bob McDonnell supports lowering taxes, not raising them for any reason, Bob McDonnell is a proud Conservative, Creigh Deeds is a follower of Obamonomics, Bob McDonnell is a defender of life, Creigh Deeds is not.
  5. Bob McDonnell is a man with a Conservative Capitalistic future, Creigh Deeds is a man with the same ole same ole approach, which one really appeals during this economic recession?

Bob McDonnell is a pro-second amendment, pro-all of the above energy approach, a friend of the taxpayer, a supporter of life, and a man who has a Capitalistic Conservative plan, not more big government problem causing so called solutions.

Bob McDonnell for Governor.

--Tim K

Friday, October 2, 2009

Another reason to oppose liberal justices to the Supreme Court.

Besides for the fact that liberal justices always make the wrong decision, are usually against the foundations of the United States Constitution, do not believe in the Constitution as our Founders wrote it, believe in putting race above the law, and believe in skipping the Constitutional authority of legislation belonging to the United States Congress, there is one more reason to oppose liberal justices.



When Montana joined the United States of America, Montana made a contract with the United States of America that all persons in Montana would have the right to bear arms, or else they would legally be able to leave the United States of America. Dozens of Montana lawmakers threatened the United States Supreme Court with this fact when they we're debating the Heller case, inwhich they correctly ruled that all Americans have the individual right to bear arms.

Thus, Montana remained in the Union.

Consider this, 27 Montana Assemblyman, 15 Montana Senators, Montana's Secretary of State, and elected Congressman at large, all supported Montana's contract rights to leave the United States if their right to bear arms we're infringed in anyway. I wish my elected officials had the brass that these guys have.

Whenever I hear of a Supreme Court Justice that is ill, I usually am concerned with the balance of the Supreme Court, however, we should also worry about the presence of Montana in the United States as well, as Montana is a state that loves firearms and the right to bear arms. So when considering the next Supreme Court nominee, ask yourself this question, "what will Montana do?".

Old Washington Times article on the subject -

-- Tim K

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Obama does not understand the Russian threat.

After Russia invaded the Nation of Georgia last year, Senator John McCain quickly condemned the action by the Russians, and declared that we are all "Georgians" today. Considering we have had at least two freedom movements in the past eight months which have been ignored by Obama, that should have been reason enough to support McCain in the Presidential election.

Obama at first blamed both the Russians and the Georgians in an utter disregard for the Nation of Georgia, a small yet staunch ally of the United States, after several days of being called out by John McCain, Obama quickly changed his position on the issue, making John Kerry very proud, and did you know that he served in Vietnam?

This leads me to conclude that Obama just does not understand the Russian threat. What do I mean by Russian threat, in a time when Iran is becoming more dangerous, North Korea is as always spiraling into lunacy, and Obama is waffling on the terror threat overseas. I mean that Russia will never be our ally, Russia is a committed foe, and their goal is to control their former satellites at all costs.

Why do you think Russia launched a invasion into Georgia? It was to display their military muscle to the world, and the Nations of Ukraine, Georgia, Poland, among other Nations which have escaped the grasp of Russia, and are looking at possibly joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which would ensure that Russia would never be able to touch their former slave states again.

When John McCain characterized Putin as "KGB" he was 100% accurate, Putin is a evil man by trade, it appears he will continue his reign of ruling Russia, such as a mini-dictatorship, Russia appears to be the only Nation that is winning when it comes to United States foreign policy, and they have even conducted war games close to American waters in the Atlantic.

Russia is a threat. A threat which Obama is ignoring, something that can only lead to problems for American and our allies.

--Tim K.

Infolinks In Text Ads


blogger templates | Make Money Online