Monday, August 30, 2010

Proof: Democrats at Fault for the Recession

Claims have been bandied about that President Bush was at fault for the economic down-turn that began in late 2007.  Until now, Democrats have pointed the finger at our 43rd President, stating that he single-handedly pushed our nation to the brink of economic collapse.  That stops today.  Examining unemployment, national debt data, and GDP growth, the truth becomes clear and apparent.  President Bush was not at fault for the recession we are in.  The Democrats who took over Congress in 2007 are.

From 1995 to January of 2007, Republicans held at least one house of Congress.  However, in the 2006 mid-term elections, Democrats won control of both the House and Senate.  They took their new offices in January, 2007.  Soon after that time until now, the United States has entered a deep recession, often attributed to President Bush.  However, examining the actions of the Democratic Congress and the effects that came, the truth is revealed.

Unemployment is a figure that commands the attention of everyone, from the rich to the poor.  Examining its data seems the logical place to start.  While President Bush and Republicans controlled Congress, unemployment stayed around 5%, increasing by slightly over 1% after 9/11, from 4.7% to 6.3% in January of 2002.  However, it eventually fell to 4.1% by the time of the November 2006 election.  After Democrats took office, they passed incredibly expensive new bills, including raising minimum wage and the CLEAN Energy Act.

Under the Democrats, unemployment started to balloon.  It stated to climb, rising past 4.5%, past 5%, past 6%, and past 6.5%, all the way to 8.5% by the time they had been in office for just two years.  By then, President Obama had been inaugurated, and unemployment continued to rise as spending increased.  This chart explains, in depth, the bills Democrats passed, and the effects they had from November 2006-March 2010 (click for a sharper, bigger image):
As you can see, the massive new spending that has been taking place from 2007-the present has had a major effect on unemployment.

A large National Debt data is also something that Democrats like to blame President Bush for.  However, examining our debt as a percent of our GDP shows the truth again.  This number sounds complicated, but in fact it is pretty simple.  "Our debt as a percent of our GDP" simply means that if our GDP is $100 and our debt is $60, then our "debt as a percent of our GDP" is 60%.  From 2001-2007 (when Republicans left office), the percent of our debt grew from 57.4% to 65.6%, or 8.8% (around 1.2% a year).  Though the number did rise, you must take into account 9/11, the devastation from Hurricane Katrina, and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.  Further, from 2005-2007, it slowed to an average of .5% per year, which means it may have began to go down in the near future.

Then Democrats took office.  In their first full year in office, the debt as a percent of GDP rose 4.6%, from 65.6% to 70.2%.  The next year was even more astounding, as the percent rose 15.9%, to 86.1%.  So far this year, the percent is up another 5% to 91.1%.  This graph explains in greater detail (click for a better image):
See the huge spike on the right side?  That's when Democrats took control of Congress.

The growth of our very economy is also very important to examine.  Under President Bush and the Republican Congress, our GDP grew on average around 3%, peaking in the fall of 2003 to nearly 7%.  The GDP only decreased in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, and that was only for one quarter.

Then Democrats took Congress.  At the beginning of 2008, our GDP sharply dropped.  By the end of 2008, it was retracting at a rate of almost 7%.  This graph shows everything in more detail (click for a bigger, sharper image):
The fall in growth under Democrats is amazing.

Examining this data, there can only be one conclusion: the United States entered our recession as the result of the Democratic takeover of Congress in 2007.  The truth is out.  Once again, the Democratic strategy of blaming President Bush for everything is revealed to be a lie.  It is quite possible that the only way to remedy the recession we are in is to once again elect a Republican majority.

The truth is out.

-- Mike

Remember to support our advertisers!


Anonymous said...

Are you really and truly this dumb and this poor a writer...or is this satire? If that latter, you are doing a wonderful job!

Anonymous said...

The natural business cycle has had socialist insanity piled upon it. The result should not be surprising.

Anonymous said...

Top Anon:
Read the article and you'll understand.

Michael in MI said...

Great job using facts to counteract the Democrats' and MF-ing media lies.

I listened this morning on the way to the gym as Frank Beckman here in Detroit had the leader of the Michigan Democrat Party on his radio show on WJR AM760. Beckman challenged him on the Democrats' claim that they were anti-Wall Street, when it was them who wrote the legislation for the bailouts of WallStreet. The Dem Tool said "no no, it was Bush and the GOP". Beckman then came back and stopped him and corrected him, informing him that Democrats took control of Congress in JAN 2007, so they wrote all the bills from then on. The tool then went on to state that "well back then we had no choice, and the GOP supported it too...". Unfortunately, Beckman did not have time to go through this and explain to him that, in fact, the GOP did NOT support Bush and the Democrats in their bailouts. And, in fact, half the bailout spending came at the request of "President Elect" Barack Obama in JAN 2009. It was good to see Beckman correct him about the Democrat Congress though, at least.

Anyway, keep up the good work. Eventually, facts will trump the Left's lies and 24/7 cries of 'racism' and 'bigotry'.

Anonymous said...

The sad thing is that the president has veto power and GW did not use it enough.

Anonymous said...

This makes a vague and very ungrounded relationship between the two. The recession is the result of democrat spending, the outsourcing boom, lack of oversight on Freddie mac, and banking deregulation(amongst many more variables), there is no one man, nor group, to point a finger at.

Infolinks In Text Ads


blogger templates | Make Money Online