Sunday, August 16, 2009

Exposing the Most Touted Lie in the Health Care Debate

What is the largest lie being spread around during the current health care debate? Is it that death panels will be in the legislation? Nope, the United States Senate confirmed them by removing that language from the Senate version (it still remains in the House version). Is it that socialist health care is dreadful for the people, in terms of economic & personal survival? Nope, as proven by the hundreds of thousands of foreigners (mostly from Canada, and the Italian Prime Minister) who flock away from socialized medicine, and come to the United States Capitalistic health care system every year.

Then it must be that lie that Obama supports single payer health care, no......... that is actually fact, as proven by numerous videos which show the President telling the truth about his beliefs in regards to health care to his flock, while lying to the American people about his intentions.

In fact, none of the above mentioned is a lie, as the White House and idiotic Congressional Democrats attempt to prove otherwise, which is impossible, and which is why they are losing the health care debate.

The largest lie comes from the liberal spectrum of American politics, as hundreds of left of center nonsense stream blogs have touted the lie that 20,000 Americans die a year because of rationing, this lie has grown to the lie that insurance companies have denied coverage for 20,000 Americans a year, because of lust of profits.....which makes no sense because more profits come when the patients remain alive longer.

Howabout we expose the lie, and actually showcase the truth for once.

The claim is that 20,000 Americans die a year because they have no insurance, or because they are under-insured (NOTE : I wonder what it will be like when the federal government runs it, and resources are cut down to the bare minimum), because they did not have the money to go visit the doctor, and never learned about the danger that awaited them. 1.Please define what under-insured is? Because if you can afford insurance, and you are under-insured (whatever the hell that means), you should be able to afford a 100 dollar doctor visit. 2.Considering the ultra poor have insurance already (through government run programs), these people have to be in between the government & private health care income range, and I am in that mold, if I needed to do a yearly or twice a year appointment to check up on my medical status, I could. But, I never do, because I don't want to.

Are these people rationed? No.

Who is to say that if they had the best health coverage in the world, they would then visit the doctor? Perhaps, they never visit the doctor on regular appointments, except when they are sick. A lot of people do that, including myself, and even when I am sick, I usually sleep & have chicken noodle soup, that would never change, health care insurance or not. What is the point of wasting time to hear what I have, when I already know I have the flu.

Rationed? No. Under-insured? No. Lazy? Appears to be.

I wonder how many people die a year, who have private health care insurance, and never visit the doctor on regular appointments. Then again, liberals would attempt to promote that as under-insured, when it is just laziness on the part of the patient.

Authors note : I admit, I am lazy when it comes to medical checkups, but it has nothing to do with costs, or medical insurance, or some other idiotic liberal lie. Want to lower the health insurance costs? 1.TORT Reform. 2.Get rid of all of the idiotic requirements for insurance companies to insure, such as hair transplants. 3.Allow Americans in any state to select their health insurance from any state. 4.Get the Government the hell out, let the Private sector run it without government involvement.


B. Johnson said...

Regardless of all the lies that Obama and Congress are telling us concerning Obamacare, don't overlook the biggest problem associated with Obamacare, IMO. The biggest problem is, that given the federal Constitution is silent about public healthcare, the 10th A. automatically reserves government power to regulate healthcare to the states, not the Oval Office and Congress.

In fact, Chief Justice Marshall had established the following case precedent, now wrongly ignored, which appropriately limits the power of the feds to lay taxes.

"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." --Chief Justice Marshall, GIBBONS V. OGDEN (1824)

So not only is Obamacare being based on constitutionally nonexistent federal government power, power that the corrupt federal government is wrongly usurping from the states, but the feds never had the power to lay taxes to fund Obamacare in the first place. Same problems with the Stimulus Package.

Sadly, the following link should help people to understand how state sovereignty ignorant voters have shot themselves in the foot with big, corrupt federal government.

The 16th & 17th Amendments and the big, corrupt fed. gov.

Infolinks In Text Ads


blogger templates | Make Money Online